In the course of IAAS VM migrations from on-premises to Azure, the VM IP address changes. In Windows VM we typically invoke a command like
which is part of the DnsClient PowerShell module.
The Validate-NameResolution cmdlet part of the AZSBTools module, queries each DNS server in the current AD to make sure that all DCs in the current AD forest resolve a given computer name to the same IP. This helps to diagnose instances where DNS partition replication is not functioning properly, where some DC’s resolve a given computer name to the old on-premises IP while others resolve the same name to the new Azure IP.
This cmdlet takes one required parameter -ComputerName which accepts one or more computer names
Example: Validate-NameResolution -ComputerName ‘myTestPC’
The cmdlet outputs interim information to the console like:
In addition, it also returns PSCustom Objects, one for each resolved IP address with the following properties: ComputerName, ResolvesTo, and DNSServer similar to:
To download and install the latest version of AZSBTools from the PowerShell Gallery and its dependencies, type
Set-PSRepository -Name PSGallery -InstallationPolicy Trusted Install-Module AZSBTools,AzureRM -Force
AZSBTools contains functions that depend on AzureRM module, and they’re typically installed together.
To load the AZSBTools and AzureRM modules type:
Import-Module AZSBTools,AzureRM -DisableNameChecking
To view a list of cmdlets/functions in SB-Tools, type
Get-Command -Module AZSBTools
To view the built-in help of one of the AZSBTools functions/cmdlets, type
help <function/cmdlet name> -show
help New-SBAZServicePrincipal -show
In the ever evolving Azure storage list of offerings, it may be hard to fully realize the available Azure storage offerings and their general cost structure at a given point in time. This post lays out a general summary of Azure storage offerings and costs, from the prospective of a consultant trying to make a recommendation to a large client as what storage type/options to use for which workload and why.
- This is of type ‘Microsoft.ClassicStorage/storageAccounts’
- This is considered legacy and should be migrated out of to GPv1 which provides backward compatibility to Azure classic (ASM) services
General purpose v1 (GPv1)
- This is of type ‘Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts’, kind ‘Storage’
- Does not support Cool and Archive access tier attributes
- Lower read/write transaction cost compared to GPv2
- Can be used with Azure classic (ASM) services
General purpose v2 (GPv2)
- This is of type ‘Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts’, kind ‘StorageV2’
- Supports Cool and Archive access tier attributes
- Access Tier attribute (Hot/Cool) is exposed at the account level
- Cannot be used with Azure classic (ASM) services
- Compared to Blob Storage account: GPv2 charge for Cool early deletion but not Cool data writes (per GB)
- This is of type ‘Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts’, kind ‘BlobStorage’
- This is a sub-type of GPv2 that supports only Block Blobs – not Page Blobs, Azure files, …
- Minor pricing difference: charge for Cool data writes (per GB) but not Cool early deletion
- Features similar to GPv2:
- Supports Cool and Archive access tier attributes
- Access Tier attribute (Hot/Cool) is exposed at the account level
- Cannot be used with Azure classic (ASM) services
GPv1 and Blob Block accounts can be upgraded to a GPv2 account. This change cannot be reversed.
Set-AzureRmStorageAccount -ResourceGroupName <resource-group> -AccountName <storage-account> -UpgradeToStorageV2
Data Access Tiers
Data Access Tiers are Hot, Cool, and Archive. They represent 3 different physical storage platforms.
For the purpose of simplification, I will refer to LRS pricing in US East Azure region in US dollars for the next 450TB/month.
- Data Access Tiers are supported in GPv2 accounts only (and the Block Blob storage sub-type) not GPv1
- A blob cannot be read directly from the Archive tier. To read a blob in Archive, it must first be moved to Hot or Cool.
- Data in Cool tier is subject to minimum stay period of 30 days. So, moving 1 TB of data to Cool tier for example, obligates the client to paying for that storage for 30 days at a minimum even if the data is moved or deleted before the end of the 30 days. This is implemented via the ‘Early deletion charge’ which is prorated.
- Data in Archive tier is subject to minimum stay period of 180 days.
- This is the regular standard tier where data can be routinely read and written
- Storage cost is 2 cents per GB per month
- Lowest read and write IO charges (5 cents per 10k write, 0.4 cents per 10k read)
- No data retrieval charge (This is the cost to copy data to Hot tier from another tier before it can be read – already in Hot tier)
- 25% cheaper storage cost down to 1.5 cents per GB per month
- More costly read and write IO charges (10 cents per 10k write = 200% Hot, 1 cent per 10k read = 250% Hot)
- 1 cent per GB data retrieval charge (this is the cost to copy the data to Hot tier, which is a required interim step to read data that resides in Cool tier)
- 90% cheaper storage cost down to 0.2 cents per GB per month
- Most costly read and write IO charges (10 cents per 10k write = 200% Hot, 5 dollars per 10k read = 125,000% Hot)
- 2 cent per GB data retrieval charge (this is the cost to copy the data to Hot tier, which is a required interim step to read data that resides in Archive tier)
- The archive tier can only be applied at the blob level, not at the storage account level
- Blobs in the archive storage tier have several hours of latency (Is this tier using tape not disk!?)
Geo-replication refers to automatically keeping a copy of a given Storage Account data in another Azure region that’s 400 miles or more away from the primary site. The primary Azure site is the Azure region where the Storage account resides and where the usual read/write transactions occur. The choice of a secondary site is a constant determined by Microsoft and is available if the client chooses the geo-replication feature of a Storage Account. The following is the list of the Azure region pairs as of 18 June 2018
Data in the secondary Azure region cannot be accessed. It is only used under the following conditions:
- Microsoft declares a region-wide outage. For example East US. This is a Microsoft triggered – not client triggered event
- Microsoft will first try to restore the service in that region. During that time data is not accessible for read or write. It’s unclear how long will Microsoft pursue this effort before moving to geo-failover.
- Microsoft initiates geo-failover from the primary to secondary region. That’s all data of all tenants in the primary region.
- This is essentially a DNS change to re-point the storage end points’ fully qualified domain names to the secondary region
- The RPO (Recovery Point Objective) is 15 minutes. That’s to say up to 15 minutes worth of data may be lost.
- The RTO (Recovery Time Objective) is unclear. That’s the time between primary site outage to data availability for read and write on the secondary site
- At the end of the geo-failover, read/write access is restored (for geo-replicated storage accounts only of course)
- At a later time, Microsoft will perform a geo-failback which is the same process in the reverse direction
- This is a process that never happened before. No Azure data center ever sustained a complete loss.
- It’s unclear when failback will be triggered, whether it will include down-time, or another 15 minute data loss.
A storage account can be configured in one of several choices with respect to geo-replication:
LRS (Locally redundant storage)
When a write request is sent to Azure Storage Account, the transaction is fully replicated on three different physical disks across three fault domains and upgrade domains inside the primary location, then success is returned back to the client.
GRS (Geo-redundant storage)
In addition to triple synchronous local writes, GRS adds triple asynchronous remote writes of each data block. Data is asynchronously replicated to the secondary Azure site within 15 minutes.
ZRS (Zone-redundant storage)
ZRS is similar to LRS but it provides slightly more durability than LRS (12 9’s instead of 11 9’s for LRS over a given year).
It’s ony available to GPv2 accounts.
RA-GRS (Read access geo-redundant storage)
RA-GRS is similar to GRS but it provides read access to the data in the secondary Azure site.
Azure Automation allows Azure administrators to run PowerShell and other scripts against an Azure subscription. They provide several benefits versus running the same scripts from the user desktop computer including:
- Scripts run in Azure and are not dependent on the end-user desktop
- Scripts are highly available by design.
- Scheduling is a built-in feature
- Authentication is streamlined for both classic ASM and current ARM resources
To get started with Azure Automation;
- Create an Azure Automation account
- Install needed PowerShell modules
- Create, run, test, schedule scripts
Create an Azure Automation account
In the current portal, Create Resource > Monitoring and Management > Automation > Create
In the ‘Add Automation Account’ blade enter/select a name for the Automation Account, Azure Subscription, Resource Group, and Azure Location
Azure will take a few minutes to create the automation account and associated objects.
We can now run scripts against the Azure subscription selected above. Here are some examples:
Create a test script
In the Automation Account blade, click Runbooks
Click ‘Add a runbook’ link on the top to create a new runbook of type PowerShell
Azure creates the runbook/script, and opens the ‘Edit PowerShell Runbook’ blade
Type in the desired command, click Save, then ‘Test pane’
In the ‘Test’ blade, click ‘Start’. Azure will queue and execute the script
- This is not like the PowerShell ISE. There’s no auto-completion for one thing.
- If Azure comes across a bad command, it will try to execute THE ENTIRE SCRIPT repeatedly, and is likely to get stuck.
- This shell does not support user interaction. So, any cmdlet that would typically require a user confirmation/interaction of any type will fail. For example, Install-Module cmdlet will fail since it requires user approval/interaction to install PowerShellGet.
Install needed modules
To see available modules click ‘Modules’ in the Automation Account blade
Click ‘Browse Gallery’ on top and search for the desired module
These modules come for the Microsoft PowerShell Gallery.
Click on the desired module, view its functions, and click Import to import it to this automation shell
Now that the module is imported, we can use it in scripting in this particular automation shell:
Around mid February 2017, Microsoft released StorSimple software version 4.0 (17820). This is a release that includes firmware and driver updates that require using Maintenance mode and the serial console.
Trying the new cmdlets, the Get-HCSControllerReplacementStatus cmdlet returns a message like:
The Get-HCSRehydrationJob returns no output (no restore jobs are running)
The Invoke-HCSDisgnostics seems pretty useful and returns output similar to:
The cmdlet takes a little while to run. In this case it took 14 minutes and 38 seconds:
It returns data from its several sections like;
System Information section:
This is output similar to what we get from the Get-HCSSystem cmdlet for both controllers.
Update Availability section:
This is output similar to Get-HCSUpdateAvailability cmdlet, although the MaintenanceModeUpdatesTitle property is empty !!??
Cluster Information section:
This is new exposed information. I’m guessing this is the output of some Get-HCSCluster cmdlet, but this is pure speculation on my part. I’m also guessing that this is a list of clustered roles in a traditional Server 2012 R2 failover cluster.
Service Information section:
This is also new exposed information. Get-Service is not an exposed cmdlet.
Failed Hardware Components section:
This is new exposed information. This device is in good working order, so this list may be false warnings.
Firmware Information section:
This output is similar to what we get from Get-HCSFirmwareVersion cmdlet
Network Diagnostics section:
Most of this information is not new, but it’s nicely bundled into one section.
Performance Diagnostics section:
Finally, this section provides new information about read and write latency to the configured Azure Storage accounts.
The full list of exposed cmdlets in Version 4.0 is:
19 December 2016
After a conference call with Microsoft Azure StorSimple product team, they explained:
- “The maximum recommended full backup size when using an 8100 as a primary backup target is 10TiB. The maximum recommended full backup size when using an 8600 as a primary backup target is 20TiB”
- “Backups will be written to array, such that they reside entirely within the local storage capacity”
Microsoft acknowledge the difficulty resulting from the maximum provisionable space being 200 TB on an 8100 device, which limits the ability to over-provision thin-provisioned tiered iSCSI volumes when expecting significant deduplication/compression savings with long term backup copy job Veeam files for example.
- When used as a primary backup target, StorSimple 8k devices are intended for SMB clients with backup files under 10TB/20TB for the 8100/8600 models respectively
- Compared to using an Azure A4 VM with attached disks (page blobs), StorSimple provides 7-22% cost savings over 5 years
15 December 2016
On 13 December 2016, Microsoft announced the support of using StorSimple 8k devices as a backup target. Many customers have asked for StorSimple to support this workload. StorSimple hybrid cloud storage iSCSI SAN features automated tiering at the block level from its SSD to SAS to Azure tiers. This makes it a perfect fit for Primary Data Set for unstructured data such as file shares. It also features cloud snapshots which provide the additional functionality of data backup and disaster recovery. That’s primary storage, secondary storage (short term backups), long term storage (multiyear retention), off site storage, and multi-site storage, all in one solution.
However, the above features that lend themselves handy to the primary data set/unstructured data pose significant difficulties when trying to use this device as a backup target, such as:
- Automated tiering: Many backup software packages (like Veeam) would do things like a forward incremental, synthetic full, backup copy job for long term retention. All of which would scan/access files that are typically dozens of TB each. This will cause the device to tier data to Azure and back to the local device in a way that slows things down to a crawl. DPM is even worse; specifically the way it allocates/controls volumes.
- The arbitrary maximum allocatable space for a device (200TB for an 8100 device for example), makes it practically impossible to use the device as backup target for long term retention.
- Example: 50 TB volume, need to retain 20 copies for long term backup. Even if change rate is very low and actual bits after deduplication and compression of 20 copies is 60 TB, we cannot provision 20x 50 TB volumes, or a 1 PB volume. Which makes the maximum workload size around 3TB if long term retention requires 20 recovery points. 3TB is way too small of a limit for enterprise clients who simply want to use Azure for long term backup where a single backup file is 10-200 TB.
- The specific implementation of the backup catalog and who (the backup software versus StorSimple Manager service) has it.
- Single unified tool for backup/recovery – now we have to use the backup software and StorSimple Manager, which do not communicate and are not aware of each other
- Granular recoveries (single file/folder). Currently to recover a single file from snapshot, we must clone the entire volume.
In this article published 6 December 2016, Microsoft lays out their reference architecture for using StorSimple 8k device as a Primary Backup Target for Veeam
There’s a number of best practices relating to how to configure Veeam and StorSimple in this use case, such as disabling deuplication, compression, and encryption on the Veeam side, dedicating the StorSimple device for the backup workload, …
The interesting part comes in when you look at scalability. Here’s Microsoft’s listed example of a 1 TB workload:
This architecture suggests provisioning 5*5TB volumes for the daily backups and a 26TB volume for the weekly, monthly, and annual backups:
This 1:26 ratio between the Primary Data Set and Vol6 used for the weekly, monthly, and annual backups suggests that the maximum supported Primary Data Set is 2.46 TB (maximum volume size is 64 TB) !!!???
This reference architecture suggests that this solution may not work for a file share that is larger than 2.5TB or may need to be expanded beyond 2.5TB
Furthermore, this reference architecture suggests that the maximum Primary Data Set cannot exceed 2.66TB on an 8100 device, which has 200TB maximum allocatable capacity, reserving 64TB to be able to restore the 64TB Vol6
It also suggests that the maximum Primary Data Set cannot exceed 8.55TB on an 8600 device, which has 500TB maximum allocatable capacity, reserving 64TB to be able to restore the 64TB Vol6
Even if we consider cloud snapshots to be used only in case of total device loss – disaster recovery, and we allocate the maximum device capacity, the 8100 and 8600 devices can accommodate 3.93TB and 9.81TB respectively:
Although the allocation of 51TB of space to backup 1 TB of data resolves the tiering issue noted above, it significantly erodes the value proposition provided by StorSimple.
Deleting Storage Account associated with a StorSimple Volume Container disables ALL volumes on the device
I came across the following interesting situation with an 8600 StorSimple device running software version 3.0 (17759).
All iSCSI volumes from the StorSimple device in question are down at the Windows 2012 R2 host (about a dozen volumes in this case). If you create a new volume and present it to the Windows host, attempting to partition it (GPT) fails with the error message ‘disk not ready’.
2 Additional observations were made:
- All cloud snapshots failed about a month before this incident.
- Software update 3.0 was applied to this device roughly the same time the incident occurred. The accompanying firmware update was not applied.
The time line is as follows:
- Storage account was deleted prior to 6/28/2016 (not showing in Operation Logs which are kept for 90 days)
- 60+ days later (8/28/2016) all cloud snapshots started to fail. The error message suggests failure to access the storage account
- 82+ days later around 9/20/2016, users started to report volumes not available
- 9/24/2016, software update 3.0 was applied from the classic portal
- About a dozen volumes were provisioned from this device to one Windows 2012 R2 host. Volume Containers were associated with 3 Storage Accounts in the same subscription
- One of the 3 Storage Accounts (the one on the top of the above image) was missing. Apparently it was inadvertantly deleted.
- Get-HCSSystem showed normal device condition
- iSCSI connectivity including iSCSI initiator and MPIO configuration were reviewed, tested and showed no issues.
- Ping (Test-Connection) and tracert.exe (Trace-HCSRoute) from each of the host iSCSI interfaces to each of the device iSCSI interfaces and back came back OK.
- Test-HCSMConnection showed no problems.
- Test-HcsStorageAccountCredential against the 2 existing Storage Accounts showed no problem.
Troubleshooting and Root Cause Analysis
I initially suspected that the Storage Account keys were changed without getting synchronized with the StorSimple Manager service, cutting off the device from its Storage Accounts. That would explain volume failure of all volumes and cloud snapshot failure. Both of which need to read and write to Storage Accounts.
- However, Operation Logs showed no events or records related to change of Storage Account keys associated with a StorSimple volume.
- Operation Logs showed no event/record of Storage Account deletion.
- Synchronizing the Storage Account keys of the 2 existing Storage Accounts did not solve the problem.
After opening a ticket with Microsoft, they obtained a device Support Package and recognized that the device appears to be constantly trying and failing to reach the volume whose Storage Account is deleted which is causing failure to serve the remaining unaffected volumes.
Steps to reproduce the problem
- Create 3 Storage Accounts
- Create 3 Volume Containers, each using a separate Storage Account
- Create 3 volumes, 1 in each volume container
- Present all volumes to a Windows 2012 R2 host, online, partition, format, copy test data
- Delete 1 Storage Account
- All 3 volumes will fail (inaccessible) after some time (see questions and answers section below about how much time)
Create a Storage Account with the same name as the one that was accidentally deleted, and synchronize the keys with the StorSimple Manager service
Although this solution will untie the device to serve the volumes whose Storage Accounts have not been deleted, it does not restore the volume(s) whose data is lost when their Storage Account was deleted. Such volumes’ data need to be restored from snapshot.
Questions and answers:
- If the Storage Account has been deleted 60+ days before cloud snapshots started to fail, what prompted the cloud snapshot failure if that was caused by Storage Account deletion?
- If the Storage Account has been deleted 82+ days before volumes started to fail, what prompted volume failure if that was caused by Storage Account deletion?
What happened here is that eventually, all the failed authentication attempts to the deleted storage account filled out the barrier queue (queue to the cloud). Once it is filled beyond a certain point, it becomes completely stuck, and anything in line behind it is unable to get through. It was once the barrier queue was completely overrun with all these connection issues to the deleted storage account that cause all other cloud traffic to be affected. This has the same effect as losing your cloud connection, and with this being a hybrid appliance when this happens it can cause many different issues such as we saw here with volumes being unavailable and backups unable to complete.
Recommendations to Microsoft
- Log events of Storage Account key changes in Operation Logs
- Currently 90 days worth of events show up in Operation Logs. It would be helpful if that retention period is configurable by the client on each subscription
- Make the device Support Package available to the client without the need for a key from Microsoft. In this case, information available only in the Support Package held the key to the workaround/solution.
- Update the device software so that loss of a Storage Account affects only its associated volumes not all volumes (Perhaps a separate queue per volume container instead of a queue per device)
- Update the StorSimple Manager service or/and Storage Account so that a Storage Account cannot be deleted if there’s an associated StorSimple Volume Container
This post lists StorSimple software versions, their release dates, and major new features for reference. Microsoft does not publish release dates for StorSimple updates. The release dates below are from published documentation and/or first hand experience. They may be off by up to 15 days.
- Version 4.0 (17820) – released 12 February 2017 – see release notes, and this post.
- Major new features: Invoke-HCSDiagnostics new cmdlet, and heatmap based restores
- Version 3.0 (17759) – released 6 September 2016 – see release notes, and this post.
- Major new features: The use of a StorSimple as a backup target (9/9/2016 it’s unclear what that means)
- Version 2.2 (17708) – see release notes
- Version 2.1 (17705) – see release notes
- Version 2.0 (17673) – released January 2016 – see release notes, this post, and this post
- Major new features: Locally pinned volumes, new virtual device 8020 (64TB SSD), ‘proactive support’, OVA (preview)
- Version 1.2 (17584) – released November 2015 – see release notes, this post, and this post
- Major new features: (Azure-side) Migration from legacy 5k/7k devices to 8k devices, support for Azure US GOV, support for cloud storage from other public clouds as AWS/HP/OpenStack, update to latest API (this should allow us to manage the device in the new portal, yet this has not happened as of 9/9/2016)
- Version 1.1 (17521) – released October 2015 – see release notes
- Version 1.0 (17491) – released 15 September 2015 – see release notes and this post
- Version 0.3 (remains 17361) – released February 2015 – see release notes
- Version 0.2 (17361) – released January 2015 – see release notes and this post
- Version 0.1 (17312) – released October 2014 – see release notes
- Version GA (General Availability – 0.0 – Kernel 6.3.9600.17215) – released July 2014 – see release notes – This is the first Windows OS based StorSimple software after Microsoft’s acquisition of StorSimple company.
- As Microsoft acquired StorSimple company, StorSimple 5k/7k series ran Linux OS based StorSimple software version 18.104.22.168 – August 2012
This post describes one experience of updating StorSimple 8100 series device from version 0.2 (17361) to current (8 September 2016) version 3.0 (17759). It’s worth noting that:
- StorSimple 8k series devices that shipped in mid 2015 came with software version 0.2
- Typically, the device checks periodically for updates and when updates are found a note similar to this image is shown in the device/maintenance page:
- The device admin then picks the time when to deploy the updates, by clicking INSTALL UPDATES link. This kicks off an update job, which may take several hours
- This update method is known as updating StorSimple device using the classic Azure portal, as opposed to updating the StorSimple device using the serial interface by deploying the update as a hotfix.
- Released updates may not show up, in spite of scanning for updates manually several times:
The image above was taken on 9 September 2016 (update 3.0 is the latest at this time). It shows that no updates are available even after scanning for updates several times. The reason is that Microsoft deploys updates in a ‘phased rollout’, so they’re not available in all regions at all times.
- Updates are cumulative. This means for a device running version 0.2 for example, we upgrade directly to 3.0 without the need to manually upgdate to any intermediary version first.
- An update may include one or both of the following 2 types:
- Software updates: This is an update of the core 2012 R2 server OS that’s running on the device. Microsoft identifies this type as a non intrusive update. It can be deployed while the device is in production, and should not affect mounted iSCSI volumes. Under the covers, the device controller0 and controller1 are 2 nodes in a traditional Microsoft failover cluster. The device uses the traditional Cluster Aware Update to update the 2 controllers. It updates and reboots the passive controller first, fails over the device (iSCSI target and other clustered roles) from one controller to the other, then updates and reboots the second controller. Again this should be a no-down-time process.
Maintenance mode updates:
These are updates to shared components in the device that require down time. Typically we see LSI SAS controller updates and disk firmware updates in this category. Maintenance mode updates must be done from the serial interface console (not Azure web interface or PowerShell interface). The typical down time for a maintenance mode update is about 30 minutes, although I would schedule a 2 hour window to be safe. The maintenance mode update steps are:
- On the file servers, offline all iSCSI volumes provisioned from this device.
- Log in to the device serial interface with full access
- Put the device in Maintenance mode: Enter-HcsMaintenanceMode, wait for the device to reboot
- Identify available updates: Get-HcsUpdateAvailability, this should show available Maintenance mode updates (TRUE)
- Start the update: Start-HcsUpdate
- Monitor the update: Get-HcsUpdateStatus
- When finished, exit maintenance mode: Exit-HcsMaintenanceMode, and wait for the device to reboot.
From the IT prospective a WordPress web site requires:
- A web server like Microsoft IIS or Apache
- mySQL database
Migrating a WordPress website includes copying all its files/folder structure, and its mySQL database, and changing the wp-config.php file to point to the new mySQL database. These tasks could be complicated for a large site and may require specific skills related to web site configuration and mySQL database administration. This post goes over a very simple way to migrate a WordPress web site to Azure, using the Duplicator WordPress plugin.
- Add Duplicator WordPress Plugin
- Create New Package
- Create new Azure WebApp
- Add mySQL database
- Upload the Duplicator package to the new Azure WebApp
- Run the Duplicator Package Installer
If you don’t have it already, add the WordPress Duplicator Plugin. On the Plugins page click Add New
Search for Duplicator, click Install Now
Create New Package
Click on Duplicator link on the left, then click Create New
Accept the defaults and click Next to scan your WordPress site
Duplicator scans your current WordPress site
and displays the result like:
In this example, I have a couple of warnings about large site size, and some large files. I check the box and click Build.
Duplicator builds the package:
The package consists of an Installer (installer.php file) and Archive (.zip file). I download both to my desktop. The zip file contains all the WordPress site files and folder structure + a scripted copy of the associated mySQL database
Create new Azure WebApp
In the Azure Portal, click New/Web+Mobile/Web App
In the Web App blade I type in the new Web App name ‘MyWebApp407’ which must be unique under .azurewebsites.net. I pick the Azure subscription from the Subscription drop down menu. I choose to create a new Resource Group. I give it a name; ‘MyWebApp-RG’. I click the arrow to create a new Service Plan
In the App Service Plan blade (middle) I click Create New, type in MyWebApp-SP as the name, select East-US and accept the default Pricing teir of S1 Standard.
Finally, I click OK and Create
In a few minutes Azure complete MyWebApp deployment
Add mySQL database
I browse under Resource Groups/MyWebApp-RG, and click Add
I search for mySQL, and select MySQL Database by ClearDB
and click Create
I give it a name ‘MyWebAppDB’ (avoid using other than alphanumeric characters in DB name), pick East US for the location, click the arrow and OK to accept the terms, and finally click Create
Click Refresh and note the new blank mySQL database:
Upload the Duplicator package to the new Azure WebApp
If you browse to the new web site now you may see a temporary page like:
First zip the 2 files downloaded from the Duplicator Package above into 1 file:
Next browse to the KUDU page http://MyWebApp407.scm.azurewebsites.net
Click CMD under the Debug Console menu
Browse to d:\site\wwwroot
Drag the zip file from prior steps and drag it on the right side as shown below:
Azure will upload
and unzip the file
Run the Duplicator Package Installer
Browse to the installer.php file as in http://mywebapp407.azurewebsites.net/installer.php
You will see a page similar to
Back in the Azure Portal, click MyWebAppDB/Properties
Note the Database Name, Hostname, username, and password
Back in the installer.php screen, enter the required information as shown below:
Click ‘Connect and Remove All Data’, click ‘Test Connection’, check the box to acknowledge the notices, and click ‘Run Deployment’
Click OK to continue..
The installer extracts the Duplicator Package zip file restoring the file system and rebuilds the mySQL database from the script contained in the zip file
Accept the defaults and click Run Update
The Installer makes the selected changes to the WebApp config files
Follow the installer instructions to do final testing:
Step number 2 above is actually important. Clicking on the link next to ‘2.’ above will take you to the site admin login page:
Use the same credentials from the original site.
Adjust your permalinks setting as it is on the original site.:
As a last step, once the site users have tested that everything looks OK, add a custom domain to the site and switch the domain DNS records to point to your new Azure site.